Could it be better that we are impoverished? This appears to be a daft question that need not be treated seriously. But it does now. Our age is that of unreason, all right. This is no harm anyhow, for there has always been a bunch of people, at any given point in time, who behaved in an unreason manner, and who were unreasoned men. This phenomenum, Darwinian or otherwise, can be explained a posteriori, by means of simple observation of the human history as well as a priori, through some deductive logical reasoning of the humanity structure. Since the Age of Enlightenment, those unreasoned bunch (I shall call them the reprobates) imitated in great stupidity the enlightening supposedly given to those enlightened people. Reprobates took advantage of this era, the loophole of enlightened people, and themselves began getting excessivly conceited, for they knew (they were stupid still they possessed such level of cognitive ability so as to still be called a human) this well that they were given the golden opportunity to act stupidly without ever worrying about being penalised for such stupid acts. This became excess. The excessivness emerged since the time when those Washington, Jefferson or Adams proclaimed so vigorously and cogently such unjustifiable standard that all humans are born equal andGeorge Orwell was yet to be born to remind them some of us are more equal than the others that we all were wrongly led into believing that the reprobates were actually born equal with the enligthened group. Reprobates were divided into a few categories. The worse ones were even worse than any parasites that lived on a wrong host that caused the host to die fast.
This age, I call it that of Unjustifiable Triviality Due to Excess, has a deeper element, which is the lack of reasoning and judgement but only essentially making oneself overly important but in fact no importance at all.
